If you’ve ever come across someone who told you to “hate the game, not the player”, there’s one thing you can conclude right there. You’ve either met a bag of scum, or someone shallow enough to be incapable of anything meaningful.
A lot (my god, a lot) has been said about women’s rights. Some of it even makes sense, once the rabid “That guy screwed me over and left” kind of rage tantrums have been accounted for (No, personal agony does not directly translate into a good reason for a perspective. You have to think it through and figure out which bits of your rage are justified and which ones were just you being foolish.) However, there is an inescapable fact - there are guys who are utterly immoral when it comes to sex - and as a man, I’d like to say, yeah, we hate his fucking guts too. And no, he ain’t a man, he’s a little boy who gets his ‘man’ status from the legions of foolish women looking for a bad boy to tame. Isn’t it obvious? You can’t tame a boy into a man. You have to grow them up - and given their mammary fascination, start with a rubber sucker. It’s what they’re used to.
No, I’m not looking for a convoluted way to blame this on women, despite what it may seem like. Men and women are connected on so many levels - not just the sexual - and so when you look at the reasons for something one group does, it’s almost certain you’ll find some answers on the other side of the fence. This is one of them.
One of the most common complaints from feminists is that a guy who gets busy five nights a week is a ‘player’, while a woman who does the same is a ‘ho’, and the first is a compliment while the second is an insult. First question - who the hell said ‘player’ is a compliment? The dude leaning by the corner with his balls in one hand and a bottle of Jack in the other? And you believed him?
Second question. Are women as a group saying that there aren’t women who sleep around, or that women who do should be given a ‘nothing you do will impact your life’ token? Life is about making decisions and dealing with the consequences of them. If you don’t want to be classified as someone with no morals, sexual or otherwise, then for god’s sake, live by some fucking morals, instead of trying to reset the bar so that decent behaviour is something extra good, instead of just normal.
And as a final bit of bile, this Slut Walk is just fucking idiotic. What are you women setting out to achieve? Some sort of shoot-yourself-in-the-foot balance by making sure the next two centuries are dominated by women behaving like Charlie Sheen?
Trifeck

5 comments:
Dear Trifeck,
How we women wish that men (and women, actually) could act so reasonably, under the influence of... well, each other? ;)
where's part 2?
maybe if women behaved like idiotic men for a few decades, things would change. what do you think about that? slut walk not such a bad idea, after all?
@Anonymous: Will be posting it soon.
@Just_a_girl: Sure, things would change. This seems like a pretty foolish change to bring about, though - women have been complaining about male infidelity for generations - how does women becoming as slutty as men help that?
Nice Post I like it.
Chartsmakemoney providing services of Technical Analysis, technical analysis book, technical analysis course and technical analysis guide from India.
Post a Comment